国际法院重申国际法规则，即只有独立的主权国家才有权制定条约。英国必须在联合国安理会的监督下将北婆罗洲和沙捞越归还给他们的人民。或者，马来西亚可以在联合国安理会的监督下这样做。英国和马来西亚也可以根据联合国安理会的建议被带到国际刑事法院，负责北婆罗洲和沙捞越的困境。同样，鉴于国际法院对查戈斯群岛的裁决，北婆罗洲和沙捞越的立法机构应该辩论裁决和援引国际自决法。立法机构还可以注意到，MA63第8条可能不适用，因为根据国际法，殖民地不能成为国际协议的缔约方。
立法机构应注意到法律部长VK Liew告诉媒体，司法部长Tommy Thomas建议他不要在2019年4月9日提出的第1条第（2）款修正案中提及1963年马来西亚协议（MA63）。联邦宪法。
Liew说，AG认为遗漏有助于避免“并发症”。
什么是“并发症”？
MA63的复杂性在国际法中（会致使其）无效（而使MA63变成非法，导致马来西解体）。
国际法院重申国际法规则，即只有独立的主权国家才有权制定条约。
https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/drive/international-court-of-justice-rules-uk-to-cede-chagos-islands/10858748
英国必须在联合国安理会的监督下将北婆罗洲和沙捞越归还给他们的人民。
或者，马来西亚可以在联合国安理会的监督下这样做。
英国和马来西亚也可以根据联合国安理会的建议被带到国际刑事法院，负责北婆罗洲和沙捞越的困境。
同样，鉴于国际法院对查戈斯群岛的裁决，北婆罗洲和沙捞越的立法机构应该辩论裁决和援引国际自决法。
立法机构还可以注意到，MA63第8条可能不适用，因为根据国际法，殖民地不能成为国际协议的缔约方。
立法机构应注意到法律部长VK Liew告诉媒体，司法部长Tommy Thomas建议他不要在2019年4月9日提出的第1条第（2）款修正案中提及1963年马来西亚协议（MA63）。联邦宪法。
Liew说，AG认为遗漏有助于避免“并发症”。
什么是“并发症”？
MA63的复杂性在国际法中无效。
国际法院对查戈斯的裁决也提到了。
从头开始
void这个词的含义是空的或什么都没有。
从法律上讲，无效意味着无效或没有法律效力。
从头开始无效意味着从一开始就合法无效。
如果文档或行为从头开始宣布为无效，则表示文档/行为自创建之日起无效。
法律视为文件/行为从未存在过。
根据MA63第1条不适用，英国将北婆罗洲和砂拉越转移到马来西亚，作为联邦的殖民地。
话虽如此，但值得注意的是，联邦法院可能会拒绝对国际法院对查戈斯的裁决作出法律裁决。
它可能会建议马来西亚政府与北婆罗洲和沙捞越人民解决问题。
FernzTheGreat
UK must return North Borneo and Sarawak to their people under the supervision of the UN Security Council
ICJ reaffirmed international law rule that only independent sovereign states have power to make treaties.
https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/drive/international-court-of-justice-rules-uk-to-cede-chagos-islands/10858748
UK must return North Borneo and Sarawak to their people under the supervision of the UN Security Council.
Alternatively, Malaysia can do so, under the supervision of the UN Security Council.
The UK and Malaysia can also be taken to the ICC, on the advice of the UN Security Council, to be held responsible for the plight of North Borneo and Sarawak.
Again, in view of ICJ ruling on Chagos Islands, the legislatures of North Borneo and Sarawak should debate the ruling and Invoke international law on self-determination.
The legislatures can also note that Article 8 of MA63 may not be applicable since Colonies could not be party, under international law, to international agreements.
The legislatures should take note of the fact that Law Minister V. K. Liew told the media that Attorney General Tommy Thomas advised him against making any reference to the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) in the proposed 9 April 2019 amendment to Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution.
The AG, said Liew, felt the omission would help avoid “complications”.
What are the “complications”?
The complications arise from MA63 not being valid in international law.
The ICJ ruling on Chagos also refers.
Void ab initio
The meaning of the word void is empty or containing nothing.
Legally, void means invalid or having no legal force or effect.
Void ab initio means legally invalid from the very beginning.
If a document or act is declared void ab initio, it means that the document/act was invalid from the date it was made.
The law treats as if the document/act never existed.
UK transferred North Borneo and Sarawak to Malaysia, under the inapplicable Article 1 of MA63, as Colonies to be Federated States.
Having said that, it’s important to note that the Federal Court may decline to give a point of law ruling on the ICJ ruling on Chagos.
It may advise the Malaysian gov’t to settle the issue with the people of North Borneo and Sarawak.
Imran Khan said in China recently that corruption was the root cause of poverty in Pakistan.
He said wealth was being transferred from those who have no power to those who have power.
Such wealth was parked overseas.
As Putin said, Pakistan has become a big cemetery. Those who plundered the country only returned home in a coffin.
“You can’t develop a cemetery,” said Putin.
In Borneo, besides corruption, colonisation was another reason for the grinding poverty.
Wealth was being transferred from Borneo to Malaya.
Author: fernzthegreat
Joe Fernandez holds a honours degree in management, majoring in economics, and is completing a law degree. He's a longtime Borneo watcher, keen on the history and legal aspects of Malaya's presence in Sabah and Sarawak. He teaches the English language privately. His English Speaking classes and examination-oriented programmes are popular in Kota Kinabalu, Kuching and Kuala Lumpur. View all posts by fernzthegreat
Author fernzthegreat Posted on April 15, 2019
PREVIOUS Previous post: Negrito came to Malaya from Kerala, southwest India, 40, 000 years ago
RECENT POSTS
UK must return North Borneo and Sarawak to their people under the supervision of the UN Security Council April 15, 2019
Negrito came to Malaya from Kerala, southwest India, 40, 000 years ago April 14, 2019
Malays will vote for Malay thieves April 14, 2019
If Jeffrey Kitingan had voted for the proposed Article 1(2) in the Federal Constitution, he would have signed his own death warrant April 11, 2019
Unless the Federal Court, sitting as the Constitutional Court, rules otherwise, the Government of Malaysia will stamp its authority on Johor April 11, 2019